This readme.txt file was generated on <20211111> by ------------------- GENERAL INFORMATION ------------------- 1. Title of Dataset SKM Evaluation of parental microalgae receiving CO2 compared to parental microalgae not receiving CO2 in monoculture 2. Author Information Principal Investigator Contact Information Name: Sarah McMurtry Institution: Stellenbosch University Address: JH Neethling Building, Victoria Street, Stellenbosch, 7600 Email: sarahmc@sun.ac.za ORCID: 0000-0001-9071-1153 Associate or Co-investigator Contact Information Name: Institution: Address: Email: ORCID: Associate or Co-investigator Contact Information Name: Institution: Address: Email: ORCID: 3. Date of data collection (single date, range, approximate date) <20200807> 4. Geographic location of data collection (where was data collected?): Stellenbosch 5. Information about funding sources that supported the collection of the data: Royal Society (UK) -------------------------- SHARING/ACCESS INFORMATION -------------------------- 1. Licenses/restrictions placed on the data: None 2. Links to publications that cite or use the data: n/a 3. Links to other publicly accessible locations of the data: n/a 4. Links/relationships to ancillary data sets: n/a 5. Was data derived from another source? No If yes, list source(s): 6. Recommended citation for the data: McMurtry, S.K., 2022. Potential of the Microalgae Chlorella sorokiniana for Carbon Capture from Winery Fermentations and Wastewater Bioremediation Stellenbosch University. --------------------- DATA & FILE OVERVIEW --------------------- 1. File List A. Filename: SKM Evaluation of parental microalgae receiving CO2 compared to parental microalgae not receiving CO2 Short description: Growth of microalgae Chlorella sorokiniana in Tris-Acetate-Phosphate medium with no C source and 20 mM ammonium for 7 days receiving CO2 from winery wastewater isolates Saccharomyces cerevisiae or not receiving CO2. B. Filename: Short description: C. Filename: Short description: 2. Relationship between files: n/a 3. Additional related data collected that was not included in the current data package: 4. Are there multiple versions of the dataset? no If yes, list versions: Name of file that was updated: i. Why was the file updated? ii. When was the file updated? Name of file that was updated: i. Why was the file updated? ii. When was the file updated? -------------------------- METHODOLOGICAL INFORMATION -------------------------- 1. Description of methods used for collection/generation of data: Includes growth of Chlorella sorokiniana (OD at 750 nm) receiving or not receiving CO2 from winery wastewater yeast strain 2. Methods for processing the data: 3. Instrument- or software-specific information needed to interpret the data: Microsoft Excel 4. Standards and calibration information, if appropriate: n/a 5. Environmental/experimental conditions: McMurtry, S.K., 2022. Potential of the Microalgae Chlorella sorokiniana for Carbon Capture from Winery Fermentations and Wastewater Bioremediation Stellenbosch University. 6. Describe any quality-assurance procedures performed on the data: Checked by supervisors. Dr Debra Rossouw, Dr Rene Naidoo-Blassoples and Prof Florian Bauer 7. People involved with sample collection, processing, analysis and/or submission: Sarah McMurtry ----------------------------------------- DATA-SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR: SKM Evaluation of parental microalgae receiving CO2 compared to parental microalgae not receiving CO2 in monoculture ----------------------------------------- 1. Number of variables: 8 Independent (Day 0-7) and 14 (seven repeats of microalgae receiving CO2, seven repeats of microalgae not receiving CO2) dependent 2. Number of cases/rows: 19 3. Missing data codes: Code/symbol Definition Code/symbol Definition 4. Variable List Example. Name: Gender Description: Gender of respondent 1 = Male 2 = Female 3 = Other A. Name: Description: Value labels if appropriate